Soon after the 7/7 bombings in London , it came to the attention of ethnic confusion Britain that the media can really add to the problem that already exists with reference to social cohesion and differentiation of race, creed and religious groups.
Definitions of confusion
It came to my attention that an article had been published which would arguably lead to more bias/attacks on Sikhs in Britain/Europe. An image of a Sikh girl with a turban getting on to a London underground Tube was used in article 'After the bombs'. This was in the context of a series of articles about Islamic extremist and the 7/7 bombings. The question we need to ask ourselves was this is a genuine mistake or is their something more sinister that lurks beneath the veneer of everyday media? Do the media help or hinder social cohesion and differentiate between 'Asians' and what are deemed as others? are we helping the indigenous British embrace others alien to them with this coverage?perhaps they are only considering sensationalism and have not even thought to ponder the ramifications of their writing.
Tony Blair yesterday described the media 'like Feral beast.'
I attach the link to an article that i make reference to above and the image which caused shock and awe, in addition to the response from the editor further to complaints. I think you will agree this kind of press leads to further ethnic confusion Britain.
http://www.panthic.org/news/124/ARTICLE/1743/2005-09-04.html



